The belief that national sovereignty is an obstacle to solving global problems isn’t something Carney developed late in his career. It runs through every institution he’s ever been a part of, every framework he’s ever built, every speech he’s ever given. You don’t spend two decades at Goldman Sachs, the Bank of England, the WEF, Bilderberg, Brookfield, and the United Nations by accident. You don’t build a $130 trillion net zero financial alliance and propose replacing the US dollar with a synthetic global currency managed by central banks because you believe deeply in the power of individual nations to govern themselves. The man has a worldview. It’s consistent. And now he runs Canada.
Whatever you think of the current tension with Washington, the idea that Canada’s future lies with Brussels instead is not a trade argument. It doesn’t hold up as one. The EU is our second largest trading partner and it isn’t close. The math alone should end the conversation.
So why isn’t it ending the conversation?
Because I don’t think this is actually about trade. And the more I pulled on this thread, the stranger it got.
This episode is the result of weeks of research into who Mark Carney really is before he became Prime Minister. Not the central banker biography. The actual résumé. Goldman Sachs. Bank of Canada. Bank of England. WEF Foundation Board. Bilderberg Steering Committee. Brookfield Asset Management. United Nations Special Envoy. And now the highest office in Canada. Every single stop on that list shares one core belief: that the problems of the modern world are too large for individual nations to solve on their own. That the future belongs to institutions that sit above governments. That sovereignty, as we’ve traditionally understood it, is a relic of a world that no longer exists.